September 2018
Progress update
The triallists were due to do green area index (GAI) assessments over the summer, however due to dry conditions and slow establishment, only one was able to. The results from this unreplicated measurement showed that GAI was highest in the control plot, which is to be reviewed and discussed.
The yield data will be of more importance for farm decisions however, and these are due to be collected and shared soon.
There will be another round of visual soil assessments made now that the soil is softer after some rain.
All triallists are proceeding to a second year of trials, with cover crop seed ordered and an agreement to trial on a different field / plot to the first year. The treatments will be as last year: Control, cover crop only, cover crop and digestate, digestate only. One triallist has also decided to trial mycorrhizal fungi applications in addition to these treatments.
Milestone: Year 2 treatments and monitoring
August 2018
Farm background survey
The triallists are in the process of filling out surveys on the history and practice of their farm management, which will help with interpreting results.
Please log-in for free and see the attached 'Farm survey sheet' in the Field Lab Documents section, which shows the full details of the information being collected.
Milestone: Full farm surveys
July 2018
Green cover assessments
The farmers are starting to take green area index (GAI) measurements of their crops for analysis. With this being a dry summer many farmers are already busy and the coordinator is checking that they are still able to take measurements, there may be some discussion of how to cope with this if it is not feasible.
Milestone: Cash crop fast growth phase measurements
April 2018
First year results cont.
(...)
Nutrients and SOM
pH varied greatly among the farms but in general the 'digestate only' plots had the highest pH which is expected due to the digestate itself. Farm B in particular had very high pH among all the plots.
A question was posed that if a farm which already has a high pH is applying digestate, is this the best thing to do? Another question was posed around when leaching may occur.
Phosphates were high at Farm F, which was attributed to them being potato growers (therefore there is a tendency to overload the soil with P).
Farm C has a mineral soil and so the group were expecting to see a big difference in SOM between plots, however this was not the case all plots had very similar percentage.
Available N
In the combined results the 'cover crop only' trials had the lowest available N due to the cover crops utilising it. There was a lot of variation in available N and depth at which the available N was located.
At Farm A's 'field 47' (one of two trial sites on this farm), there was more available N in the control. This could be due to the large amount of SOM at the site disguising the N. Most N was found in the top 30 cm.
At the second trial site at Farm A the digestate only plot had a lot more available N in all zones (0-30cm, 30-60cm, 60-90cm).
On Farm C the 'digestate only' plot had more available N in total but most was found at the 60-90cm depth, indicating leaching through the sandy soil.
Farm G also had the highest available N in the digestate plot.
Farm H had high N in all 4 trial plots at the 60-90cm depth. Highest available N was found in the 'cover crop only' plot (most at every depth). It was every wet when sampling took place here which could have played a part in this result.
More results are to come, please revisit the page soon.
Milestone: Analyses against baseline data
April 2018
First year results
Green Area Index (GAI), leaf area and establishment.
Combined results from all trial farms:
- Control: 0.38
- Cover crop and Digestate: 1.14
- Digestate Only: 1.01
- Cover crop Only: 0.99
The combined results were a little skewed due to those from Farm G, which drilled cover crop very late (October) and did not establish well. They also had weeds in the control.
In all other farms the trials with the highest GAI were the cover crop and digestate and cover crop only, which were significantly higher than the control and digestate only.
'Cover crop and digestate' treatment plots had the highest GAI at Farm F, and Farm A's first trial site (one of two). The second site at Farm A had the same GAI readings for the 'cover crop and digestate' and 'cover crop only' treatments.
Farm C had a higher GAI in the 'cover crop only' treatment and it was noted that the digestate was applied in very hot weather which may have had negative consequences on its effect upon the soil.
VESS tests
The farmers will do further VESS tests themselves on farm in late April / early May. All measurements taken by the researcher over winter were subject to the same sampler to make sure there was no differences in the assessment. Variation exists between farms due to many reasons such as soil type.
Combined VESS test scores:
- Control: 1.52
- Cover crop and digestate: 1.63
- Digestate only: 1.65
- Cover crop only: 1.63
(...)
Milestone: Analyses against baseline data
December 2017
Winter baseline data analysis
In early December the research team undertook a full day sampling (block soil cores of the top 30 cm and other soil samples) to assess soil structure, root penetration and N, P, K, pH and TOC by NRM. This sampling is due to continue in late January / February. Microbial analysis will be undertaken later in the year by Lydia’s PhD student. Having visually assessed the soil of the trial area with digestate applied and cover crops grown, it is looking in better condition (very good root penetration and structure) than the control and the trial plot where digestate has been applied but no cover crops sown. The trial strip with only digestate looks to have had no impact on soil structure so far.
Please see the attached field lab documents for photos of the sampling undertaken in December at the control site, cover crop with no digestate application and cover crop with digestate application.
Milestone: Sampling and measurements - early winter
September 2017
Digestate applications
Digestate was applied after the cover crops were sown in summer. Pre-application soil tests have also been taken for analysis to compare against those post-treatment later in winter.
Milestone: Digestate applications
August 2017
Cover crops sown
Cover crops including black oat, buckwheat, vetch and fodder radish were sown in august before applications of digestate. These established well, with frost killing off the buckwheat in October / November.
Milestone: Cover crop establishment
June 2017
Methods finalised
The group decided that the methods will be as follows:
1. Cover crops will consist of: buckwheat (20kg/ha), fodder radish (3kg/ha), vetch (30kg/ha) and black oat (30kg/ha) – this mix has been chosen to provide a combination of deep rooting, nitrogen fixing and disease tolerance and will be provided by Cotswold Seeds.
2. Those using chopped straw will apply it with the digestate with some gentle incorporation.
3. Each farmer will identify a field of about 10 ha for the project which will be split into 4 for the different treatments:
• No treatment
• Cover crop, no digestate
• Digestate, no cover crop
• With cover crop and digestate
4. Cover crop seeds to be drilled, not broadcast
5. Timing of drilling must fit in with current farm practice – although some need to drill later (BS Farms) while others will need to put theirs in sooner. Ideally if possible, drilling should be no later than 3rd week in July and soil sampling Feb 2018 – however again, BS Farms will have their trials delayed to start and end to fit with their cropping regime.
6. Application rates will be based on nitrogen and will be corrected so that all use the same levels of nitrogen – as high as possible but still within the NVZ regulation.
7. Yield meter readings from combines are acceptable for yield data in the test areas.
8. The first pre-treatment soil sampling needs to be done before drilling (ideally by 3rd week in July). This poses a logistical challenge as the students who will be helping to do this won’t be in place until later in 2017 / early 2018.
Milestone: Field lab planning
December 2016
Field Lab Aims
The farming group wishes to explore options to optimise the use of their ADDs; maximising its nutrient value to meet crop demand and abiding by the NVZ regulations.
“By doing the trials we hope to use digestate like a regular fertiliser, replacing the inorganic fertilisers.”
Milestone: Idea formed
November 2016
Initial key field lab questions
The group identified key questions that they wanted the field lab to answer:
• How to stabilise nitrogen in the digestate
• Impact on other soil microbiology (including beneficial and pathogenic microbes) and the wider rotation
• Influence of cover crops on digestate impact
• Impact of timing of the application – possibly combining autumn application of digesate with cover crops?
• Differences between impact of liquid vs fibre digestate on soils
Milestone: Idea formed
November 2016
Initial meeting continued
(...)
• Would an autumn application vs a spring application of digestate, potentially in conjunctions with cover crops, help reduce loss of nitrogen? There are some unknowns about the influence of adding bacteria to the soils in terms of how pathogens might be affected – need to understand the interaction between soil-dwelling bacteria and those being applied in digestate and how this would impact the rotation.
• What is the impact on soil leaching of nitrogen by combining cover crops and digestate? Work at the University of East Anglia on the Salle Estate has proved valuable when using livestock manure and cover crops.
• How does the type of organic matter (liquid vs fibre) being applied to the soil influence the soil micro-organisms, especially mycorrhizal fungi? How could this influence availability of nutrients to the crop (NB Muntons is already doing some work on this with the University of Lincoln and has discovered increased in sugar concentrations in lettuces fed with digestate).
• How could digestate compare with farmyard manure in terms of how the soil microbiota is affected?
• It was agreed better monitoring, replication and sampling is needed, and all delegates were willing to be part of such a regime.
Milestone: Idea formed
November 2016
Initial meeting
Following a presentation by Dr Ruben Sakrabani of Cranfield University, the following unanswered questions / challenges were identified by those in the room:
• There is lack of clarity of the legal definition of what is described as “digestate” (ie outputs from livestock slurry, vegetable waste, waste whey, municipal food waste etc)
• There is a lack of consistency of the reporting format of those firms who analyse digestate – ideally this would also be done in real-time, according to industry standards based on agreed sampling and reporting
• The composition of some digestates are very consistent (yearly testing / analysis is adequate – others are much more variable). Does the quality of samples change in transit on its way to being analysed (possibly not if it is transported in a cool box?)
• Loss of nitrates through ammonia is potentially a major issue – the high pH favours conversion of ammonium to ammonia and hence loss to the atmosphere. How can digestate be stabilised (would lowering the pH help?) to prevent this? How can the effective availability of nitrogen be assessed – especially if some is gaseous? Would it be helpful / possible to acidify the digestate – organic acid was thought to be more appropriate that any others, but it is no known if this would work.
• Some products are already available (eg from DOW – N-Lock) to help keep nitrogen in the root zone for longer – however one delegate who had tried it saw no benefits.
(...)
Milestone: Idea formed
